Gay Agenda
Jun. 15th, 2008 02:38 amThere is much debate going on at a Dr Who community about RTD having a Gay Agenda. I am not quite sure what the Agenda is. Really with RTD's potrayals of Gay relationships, my only concern is with Jack being Transgender. JB is a well known Gay man, and in a committed relationship himself in real life. But in having him portray someone who will have sex with Anything with a post code, it brings back some arguements I have had over the years with bigots.
The arguement that Gay men cannot be in a committed relationship. They cannot be faithful to one person, because they do not reproduce. As if they only reason to be in a committed relationship is to reproduce. The same men do not mention Lesbians, or if they do, it is because of the male fantasy of two women. They are out and out bigots, and I have got rid of the one who was the worse.
They also do not think that gay couples, of either sex, should have childern. Even going as far to say that if they did, Social Services would have to come in and take the childern away. For no reason, just same sex couple would be incabable of bringing up childern. Their are many types of families out there. The traditional Mother Father, single parents (who are not always women, but yes mostly), or other family members, for what ever reason, bringing up another member of the families child(ern). These childern all survive, and thrive in these situations. There is no need for Social Services to be involved. Therefore why can't same sex parents bring up a child?
The arguement that Gay men cannot be in a committed relationship. They cannot be faithful to one person, because they do not reproduce. As if they only reason to be in a committed relationship is to reproduce. The same men do not mention Lesbians, or if they do, it is because of the male fantasy of two women. They are out and out bigots, and I have got rid of the one who was the worse.
They also do not think that gay couples, of either sex, should have childern. Even going as far to say that if they did, Social Services would have to come in and take the childern away. For no reason, just same sex couple would be incabable of bringing up childern. Their are many types of families out there. The traditional Mother Father, single parents (who are not always women, but yes mostly), or other family members, for what ever reason, bringing up another member of the families child(ern). These childern all survive, and thrive in these situations. There is no need for Social Services to be involved. Therefore why can't same sex parents bring up a child?